I. Ivashka
To Win
Y. C. Mo
To Win
Ye Cong Mo vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W L W L
Form
L W L L L W L W W LHead-2-Head: Mo 1 - 0 Wong
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mo winning 2 and Wong winning 0. The last match between Mo and Wong was at the M25 Fuzhou, 21-07-2023, Quarterfinals, Hard with Ye Cong Mo getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ye Cong Mo | 1 |
| Chak Lam Coleman Wong | 0 |
M25 Fuzhou(21-07-2023)
6
4
6
1
| Mo | Stats | Wong |
|---|---|---|
| 57% (8-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 44% (7-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 543 | Ranking | 169 |
| 543 | Highest Rank | 128 |
| 24 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 2 |
| 63% (154-90) | Career Total W/L | 56% (139-109) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $225,210 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
23 Apr 2025 / First
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Agut VS Clar PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Ye Cong Mo
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:20:0 | Average Match Time | 1:20:0 |
| 64% (37/58) | 1st Serve % | 59% (26/44) |
| 84% (31/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (18/26) |
| 38% (8/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (6/18) |
| 100% (4/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 45% (20/44) | Return Points Win % | 33% (19/58) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ye Cong Mo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 7-6(1) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Ye Cong Mo
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ye Cong Mo
Player
Renta Tokuda
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ye Cong Mo
Player
Ryuki Matsuda
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ye Cong Mo
Player
Kaichi Uchida
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Ye Cong Mo
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ye Cong Mo
Player
Jordan Chiu
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
52
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
10
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
33 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Ben Shelton
66%
(
71 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
8
Aces
17
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
53 of
67)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
38 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
28 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(3) 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Daniel Altmaier
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
0
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
19%
(
10 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Billy Harris
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
12
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
64%
(
27 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Rudolf Molleker
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (154/90) | Win/Loss | 56% (139/109) |
| 61% (327/212) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (311/267) |
| 56% (2707/2166) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (2848/2721) |
| 64% (133/76) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (115/80) |
| 61% (19/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 51% (18/17) |
| 50% (2/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43% (6/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/4) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.48 |
| 488 | Aces Total | 1313 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 476 | Total Double Faults | 502 |
| 1:10:7 | Average Match Time | 1:30:18 |
| 378 | Average Opponent Rank | 379.83 |
| 60% (6626/11093) | 1st Serve % | 60% (9161/15252) |
| 67% (4447/6626) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (6480/9161) |
| 51% (2295/4467) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2947/6091) |
| 45% (597/1323) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (583/1447) |
| 43% (4950/11609) | Return Points Win % | 39% (5962/15383) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 50% (4/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 63% (5/3) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 38% (3/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (11/13) | Challenger W/L | 55% (53/44) |
| 65% (143/76) | Futures W/L | 60% (72/49) |
| 63% (149/236) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (134/243) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 37% (18/49) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (45/81) |
| 59% (34/58) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (46/81) |
| 90% (148/133) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (129/113) |
| 9% (148/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (129/16) |
| 20% (95/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (119/25) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
